Evaluation and Comparison of the Effectiveness of Atropine Eye Drops, Ipratropium Bromide Nasal Spray, and Amitriptyline Tablet in the Management of Clozapine-Associated Sialorrhea in Patients With Refractory Schizophrenia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Clozapine, a second-generation antipsychotic medication, is mainly indicated for managing treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Among all the nonthreatening adverse effects of clozapine, sialorrhea is a stigmatizing complication occurring in approximately 31.0% to 97.4% of patients. In this study, 2 topical agents (atropine eye drop and ipratropium nasal spray) and a systemic medication (amitriptyline) were compared simultaneously for the management of clozapine-associated sialorrhea. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, single-blinded, non-placebo-controlled clinical trial from June 2022 to January 2023. Eligible patients were randomly allocated into 3 mentioned groups. Patients were monitored for sialorrhea weekly based on scales, including the Toronto Nocturnal Hypersalivation Scale, Clinical Global Impression-Improvement, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity for 1 month. Possible adverse drug reactions and adherence were also recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients, including 6, 10, and 8 individuals in ipratropium bromide nasal spray, atropine eye drop, and amitriptyline groups, completed the study, respectively. The cohort's demographic, baseline clinical, and sociocultural characteristics were comparable among the 3 groups. Within-group comparisons, between times baseline and week 4, demonstrated that significant differences were in groups atropine and amitriptyline based on Toronto Nocturnal Hypersalivation Scale, in 3 groups based on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement, and also in only-atropine group based on Clinical Global Impression-Severity. Likewise, between-group comparisons showed that atropine was significantly more effective in clozapine-associated sialorrhea management than amitriptyline and ipratropium, in the first 2 weeks and second 2 weeks of study, respectively. Regarding safety, the interventions were tolerated relatively well. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusively, atropine is more efficacious than amitriptyline, within the first 2 weeks of study and also relative to ipratropium, overall. As time effect was significant between atropine and amitriptyline, according to analysis of covariance test, further investigation with longer follow-up duration would be prudent. In addition, expanding patient population with larger sample size should be conducted for more precision.

Pharmacological interventions for antipsychotic-related sialorrhea: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Antipsychotic-induced sialorrhea carries a significant burden, but evidence-based treatment guidance is incomplete, warranting network meta-analysis (NMA) of pharmacological interventions for antipsychotic-related sialorrhea. PubMed Central/PsycInfo/Cochrane Central database/Clinicaltrials.gov/WHO-ICTRP and the Chinese Electronic Journal Database (Qikan.cqvip.com) were searched for published/unpublished RCTs of antipsychotic-induced sialorrhea (any definition) in adults, up to 06/12/2023. We assessed global/local inconsistencies, publication bias, risk of bias (RoB2), and confidence in the evidence, conducting subgroup/sensitivity analyses. Co-primary efficacy outcomes were changes in saliva production (standardized mean difference/SMD) and study-defined response (risk ratios/RRs). The acceptability outcome was all-cause discontinuation (RR). Primary nodes were molecules; the mechanism of action (MoA) was secondary. Thirty-four RCTs entered a systematic review, 33 NMA (n = 1958). All interventions were for clozapine-induced sialorrhea in subjects with mental disorders. Regarding individual agents and response, metoclopramide (RR = 3.11, 95% C.I. = 1.39-6.98), cyproheptadine, (RR = 2.76, 95% C.I. = 2.00-3.82), sulpiride (RR = 2.49, 95% C.I. = 1.65-3.77), propantheline (RR = 2.39, 95% C.I. = 1.97-2.90), diphenhydramine (RR = 2.32, 95% C.I. = 1.88-2.86), benzhexol (RR = 2.32, 95% C.I. = 1.59-3.38), doxepin (RR = 2.30, 95% C.I. = 1.85-2.88), amisulpride (RR = 2.23, 95% C.I. = 1.30-3.81), chlorpheniramine (RR = 2.20, 95% C.I. = 1.67-2.89), amitriptyline (RR = 2.09, 95% C.I. = 1.34-3.26), atropine, (RR = 2.03, 95% C.I. = 1.22-3.38), and astemizole, (RR = 1.70, 95% C.I. = 1.28-2.26) outperformed placebo, but not glycopyrrolate or ipratropium. Across secondary nodes (k = 28, n = 1821), antimuscarinics (RR = 2.26, 95% C.I. = 1.91-2.68), benzamides (RR = 2.23, 95% C.I. = 1.75-3.10), TCAs (RR = 2.23, 95% C.I. = 1.83-2.72), and antihistamines (RR = 2.18, 95% C.I. = 1.83-2.59) outperformed placebo. In head-to-head comparisons, astemizole and ipratropium were outperformed by several interventions. All secondary nodes, except benzamides, outperformed the placebo on the continuous efficacy outcome. For nocturnal sialorrhea, neither benzamides nor atropine outperformed the placebo. Active interventions did not differ significantly from placebo regarding constipation or sleepiness/drowsiness. Low-confidence findings prompt caution in the interpretation of the results. Considering primary nodes' co-primary efficacy outcomes and head-to-head comparisons, efficacy for sialorrhea is most consistent for the following agents, decreasing from metoclopramide through cyproheptadine, sulpiride, propantheline, diphenhydramine, benzhexol, doxepin, amisulpride, chlorpheniramine, to amitriptyline, and atropine (the latter not for nocturnal sialorrhea). Shared decision-making with the patient should guide treatment decisions regarding clozapine-related sialorrhea.

Histidine Metabolic Pathway Contributes to Clozapine-Induced Sialorrhea Based on Nontargeted Metabolomics.

INTRODUCTION: Clozapine-induced sialorrhea (CIS) is one of the most common side effects of clozapine use, while the mechanism remains unclear. METHODS: A total of 51 schizophrenia patients taking clozapine were selected. Among them, 32 had sialorrhea, and 19 had no sialorrhea. Saliva metabolites were identified using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-MS/MS (UHPLC-MS/MS), and the differences in saliva metabolites in each group were analyzed through qualitatively searching HMDB, KEGG, and self-built databases, combined with multivariate statistics. After further evaluation by receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, the screened differential metabolites were enriched and topologically analyzed. RESULTS: The biomarkers potentially related to CIS included 37 differential metabolites involving 17 metabolic pathways, mainly histidine metabolism (p < 0.05, impact = 0.50), pyrimidine metabolism (p < 0.05, impact = 0.08), and ß-alanine metabolism (p < 0.05, impact = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that histidine metabolic pathway may contribute to the mechanism of CIS.

Can clozapine be used by dental practitioners to increase salivary flow in patients with dry mouth? A scoping review.

OBJECTIVES: Clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic used to treat people with schizophrenia, has been proposed as a possible treatment for salivary gland hypofunction. This scoping review investigated the available literature on clozapine's impact on salivary flow, in order to determine whether it could be used by dental practitioners in low doses as a treatment for dry mouth. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search was completed using Ovid MEDLINE (1996 to Nov 2021). Key MeSH search terms included "clozapine," "Clozaril," "salivation," "salivary flow rate," "sialorrhea," "hypersalivation," and "drooling." Two reviewers independently reviewed eligible articles and extracted the data based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: The initial search identified 129 studies, six of which were included in this review. Four of them (one cross-sectional and three interventional) described salivary flow rates in schizophrenic patients taking clozapine, while one of those and two others focused on the mechanism of clozapine-induced sialorrhea, with one study covering both. There were mixed findings, with one study observing a moderate association between clozapine dose and salivary flow, and the others reporting no differences. Findings on the putative mechanisms for clozapine-induced sialorrhea (CIS) were inconclusive. CONCLUSION: There is insufficient high-quality information to justify using low-dose clozapine to increase salivary flow in dental patients with salivary gland hypofunction. Well-designed interventional studies and randomized control trials are required.

Treatment of Clozapine-Associated Sialorrhea: The Role of Benzamide Derivatives.

PURPOSE: Hypersalivation is one of the most prevalent and distressing adverse effects associated with clozapine treatment. Currently, there is no standard therapeutic approach toward how to overcome it. Clinicians use various medications for managing this adverse effect. However, some of the agents are not effective enough, whereas others can induce other adverse effects. Recently, several reviews have been published on the treatment of clozapine-associated hypersalivation, in which the focus was on drugs from various pharmacological groups, and little attention was paid to drugs from the group of substituted benzamides. The intention of this brief narrative review is to draw the attention of clinicians to the use of the benzamide group for the treatment of this unpleasant adverse effect. METHODS: A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify published treatment studies and case reports in the literature from 2000 to September 2021, concerning a treatment of clozapine-associated hypersalivation, mainly substituted benzamides. RESULTS: Accumulating evidence during the last 2 decades indicates that agents derived from the benzamide group may be effective and safe agents for treatment of clozapine-associated hypersalivation. Whether with a psychotropic effect or without, medications from this group may produce a beneficial response. CONCLUSIONS: Substitute benzamide derivatives have emerged as effective and well-tolerated agents for treatment clozapine-associated hypersalivation.

Prevalence of clozapine-induced sialorrhea and its effect on quality of life.

RATIONALE: Clozapine has proven to be superior to other antipsychotic drugs in the treatment of schizophrenia but is under-prescribed due to its potentially severe side effects. Clozapine-induced sialorrhea (CIS) is a frequent and extremely uncomfortable side effect, which remains understudied. OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence of diurnal and nocturnal CIS in a sample of patients treated with clozapine, and to evaluate its impact on quality of life. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, observational study of 130 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders treated with clozapine. The prevalence of CIS was evaluated via specific sialorrhea scales. None of the patients included in the study was receiving a specific treatment for hypersalivation during the study period. Possible associations between sialorrhea and clinical and quality of life variables were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 130 subjects, 120 (92.3%) suffered from CIS. Eighty-one (62.31%) suffered from diurnal CIS, 115 (88.56%) from nocturnal CIS, and 85 (65.38%) suffered from both. Significant positive associations between quality of life and diurnal CIS (B = 0.417; p = 2.1e - 6, R2 = 0.156) and nocturnal CIS (B = 0.411; p = 7.7e - 6, R2 = 0.139) were detected. Thirty per cent of the subjects reported a moderate to severe negative impact of sialorrhea on their quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that CIS is highly prevalent in patients with schizophrenia and has an important impact on quality of life in one-third of our sample. Therefore, the inclusion of a systematic evaluation and treatment of CIS in standard clinical practice is highly recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials ( https://clinicaltrials.gov ) under reference NCT04197037.

[Treatment options for drug-induced sialorrhea: Prescribing guidelines]. / Prise en charge de l'hypersialorrhée iatrogène : revue de la littérature et recommandations pratiques.

OBJECTIVES: Drug-induced hypersalivation is a frequent drug adverse event of psychotropic drugs. This excess salivary pooling in the mouth can cause an impairment of a patient's quality of life leading to low rates of medication adherence. The optimal management of hypersalivation is thus crucial to improve patient care. To date, no recommendations for limiting drug-induced hypersalivation have been published. In this study, we conducted a systematic review to investigate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing drug-induced hypersalivation. METHODS: Treatment of drug-induced sialorrhea based on case reports and clinical studies were sought in May 2021 from PubMed, Google Scholar and Science Direct (keywords : « treatment ¼, « hypersalivation ¼, « induced ¼, « drug ¼, « clozapine ¼). Articles published between 1966 to May 2021 on the treatment of drug-induced hypersalivation were included in this study. RESULTS: Sixty-seven articles were selected in this narrative review. First, patient education associated with non-drug related management are essential to improve the compliance to drugs inducing hypersalivation. The non-drug related management should be initiated with an increase in the frequency of swallowing with chewing gum. In the case of ineffectiveness, the dosage of drug responsive of sialorrhea can be adjusted according to the patient's response and his/her medical history (i.e. reducing the dose or splitting the daily dose). Finally, if the problem persists, a symptomatic treatment can be added according to the type of sialorrhea (diurnal or nocturnal), preferred galenic by patient, tolerance and availability of drugs. Several drugs have been tested to reduce hypersalivation induced by clozapine (61/67), risperidone (3/67), quetiapine (2/67) and aripiprazole (2/67). Among the 63 articles targeting a specific corrective treatment, anticholinergic agents were most described in the literature (41 cases out of 63) with atropine, glycopyrrolate and scopolamine (6/41 each). Other agents were described as clinically effective on hypersalivation: dopamine antagonists (9/63) with amisulpride (5/9), alpha-2-adrenergic agonists (5/63) with clonidine (3/5), botulinic toxin (4/63), and terazosine, moclobemide, bupropion and N-acetylcysteine (for each 1/63). CONCLUSIONS: In the case of drug-induced hypersalivation, after failure of non-drug therapies and dosage optimization of the causative treatment, an anticholinergic drug can be initiated. In case of insufficient response, the different treatments presented can be used depending on the galenic form, tolerance and access to those medications. The assessment of the risk-benefit balance should be systematic. The heterogeneity of the studies, the little knowledge about the pharmacological mechanism of saliva flow modulation and the unavailability of corrective drugs are different factors contributing to the complexity of therapeutic optimization.

Paliperidone-Associated Sialorrhea: A Case Report With Review of Current Literature.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic-associated sialorrhea is a problematic adverse effect with potentially negative consequences on quality of life and medication adherence. While clozapine is the antipsychotic that is most associated with sialorrhea, there have been published reports of other second-generation antipsychotics associated with sialorrhea, including aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone. Although drooling is mentioned within the package insert for paliperidone, to date there have been minimal published reports in which paliperidone is implicated as the offending agent. METHODS/PROCEDURES: Here, we present a case of sialorrhea in a 56-year-old man with schizoaffective disorder who had a supratherapeutic paliperidone level after both oral and intramuscular paliperidone use. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Paliperidone was ultimately cross tapered to aripiprazole, and the patient was given atropine drops and benztropine with resolution of the sialorrhea. We provide a review of the literature regarding the other available reports of paliperidone-associated sialorrhea, possible mechanisms behind pathophysiology, as well as reports from the World Health Organization and Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting systems. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware of the potential for paliperidone and other nonclozapine second-generation antipsychotics to be associated with sialorrhea, especially given the increased frequency of their use for a variety of psychiatric disorders.

A retrospective case notes review of the effectiveness and tolerability of metoclopramide in the treatment of clozapine-induced hypersalivation (CIH).

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to explore the long-term effectiveness and tolerability of metoclopramide in the treatment of CIH. METHOD: This study is a retrospective, observational cohort study of patients prescribed metoclopramide for CIH at the South London & Maudsley (SLaM) NHS Foundation Trust. RESULTS: Of the 96 patients identified, 14 patients were eligible for inclusion in our study. Five patients continued treatment with a mean duration of 27 months (SD = 17.8), and one patient continued until transfer with a duration of 3 months. Eight patients discontinued treatment after a mean duration of 8 months. CONCLUSION: Metoclopramide may be an effective and tolerated drug in CIH, but more data is required to establish its place in the pharmacotherapy of this condition.

A Case Report of Systemic Intoxication Following Onabotulinum Toxin A Injections Into the Salivary Glands in a Patient With Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 1.

BACKGROUND: Sialorrhea in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is caused by bulbar weakness, which is aggravated by low oromotor tone rather than saliva overproduction. Botulinum toxin (BTX) reduces sialorrhea by preventing acetylcholine release from the presynaptic secretory parasympathetic nerve terminals. An important adverse effect of BTX, as highlighted in its black box warning, is a systemic spread of BTX leading to botulismlike symptoms including dysphagia, muscle weakness, and death. These symptoms may be more pronounced in peripheral motor neuropathic disorder population such as SMA, whose neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is already dysfunctional. METHODS: We report a case of a 17-month-old boy with SMA type 1 following BTX injection for the treatment of sialorrhea. RESULTS: The boy developed severe generalized hypotonia, profound dysphagia, decreased airway clearance, and speech difficulty following BTX injection. Full gastric feeding was required. Pyridostigmine was started but with minimal effect. The patient experienced prolonged deleterious side effects of BTX, lasting upward of a year with very slow recovery of limb strengths and oromotor tone. CONCLUSIONS: NMJ dysfunction has been well described in SMA. BTX may exacerbate fragile NMJ function by inhibiting acetylcholine release at the presynaptic vesicles. As such, systematic intoxication of BTX can have far-reaching consequences in this population. A strong precaution and cautious weighing of efficacy and risk must be performed before utilizing BTX in the SMA population.

Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin for treating sialorrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Sialorrhea often happens in patients with neurologic disorders, and botulinum toxin (BoNT), which inhibits acetylcholine activation, may be an effective treatment for drooling. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BoNT in adults and children with sialorrhea due to neurological disorders. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant studies published before August 2021. The pooled estimate of outcomes was calculated using a random effect model. RESULTS: The review included 17 studies involving 981 patients. Compared with placebo, both BoNT type A (BoNT-A) and BoNT type B (BoNT-B) alleviated drooling frequency and severity (mean difference, 95% CI; BoNT-A: -1.20, -1.89 to -0.51; BoNT-B: -1.62, -2.07 to -1.17), reduced saliva weight (BoNT-A: -1.70, -2.30 to -1.10; BoNT-B: -1.12, -1.97 to -0.27), and improved global impression of change (BoNT-A: -1.30, -1.73 to -0.86; BoNT-B: -1.58, -1.95 to -1.21) in adults 4 weeks postinjection. BoNT-B remained effective at 12 weeks. In children, BoNT-A and BoNT-B alleviated sialorrhea symptoms (BoNT-A: -1.63, -2.42 to -0.85; BoNT-B: -5.20, -6.03 to -4.37) and BoNT-A reduced saliva weight (-0.77, -1.54 to 0.00) at 4 weeks postinjection. After 12 weeks, BoNT-B remained efficacious. Most adverse effects (AEs) were mild to moderate and self-limited. CONCLUSIONS: There is moderate certainty of evidence (COE) that either BoNT-A or BoNT-B could relieve sialorrhea after 4 and 12 weeks of follow-up without significantly more severe AEs in adults. However, the COE is very low to low in children.

[Botox injections in salivary glands in Parkinson's disease]. / Multifactoriële cariësprogressie bij Parkinson.

A 62-year-old lady is referred to a geriatric dentist because of sudden increased caries activity. She is suffering from Parkinson's disease. Saliva loss, or drooling, had such a negative impact on her quality of life that,she had been treated with Botox injections into her glandula parotis on both sides on referral from the neurologist until about a year ago. Hhyposalivation as a side effect of her medication in combination with the Botox injections likely caused increased caries activity. The risks of therapies to reduce salivary flow should be made known to doctors and dentists. Saliva testing should always be done before starting such a therapy and when such therapy is started, the use of additional fluoride measures is very important.

Atropine-induced toxicity after off-label sublingual administration of eyedrop for sialorrhoea treatment in neurological disabled patients.

Sialorrhea is a troublesome and disabling symptom defined by the unintentional loss of saliva from the mouth, usually associated with swallowing disorders. Today there is no consensus about the management of sialorrhoea, but off-label use of ophthalmic atropine eyedrop administered sublingually may offer benefits, despite limited safety data. We report 2 cases of atropine overdose after sublingual administration illustrating that atropine can expose to severe adverse effects when administered sublingually. The noncompartmental pharmacokinetic study of atropine performed in 1 patient highlighted that systemic absorption of sublingual atropine was effective (Cmax [1 h] = 2.2 ng mL-1 ; approximately) after a single dose of 1 mg.

Oral health effects of botulinum toxin treatment for drooling: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Drooling is a major morbidity in several neurological diseases. Intraglandular botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections have been used to manage this condition. However, by decreasing salivary flow, BoNT injections may result in an increased risk of caries and other oral adverse effects. In this study, we aimed to assess whether, in patients with drooling, intraglandular BoNT injections are associated with increased dental caries development, modifications on salivary composition (oral pH, buffering capacity and osmolality) and cariogenic bacterial load. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review, searching PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus for all experimental and observational studies reporting on adverse effects of intraglandular BoNT injections in patients with drooling. Primary study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction were independently performed by two researchers. No studies were excluded based on their language, publication status or date of publication. Studies' quality was based on revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tools. Meta-analysis was not performed. RESULTS: We retrieved 1025 studies, of which 5 were included. Two studies were two randomized controlled trials and three quasi-experimental studies. None of the included studies found BoNT injections to be associated with dental caries development or with significant reductions in oral pH. One of the included primary studies even observed an increase in salivary buffer capacity. One study found an increase in Lactobacilli counts. As for the risk of bias, two studies were classified as having a critical risk, two as high risk and one as having some concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there is no evidence that, in patients with drooling, BoNT injections associate with increased risk of dental caries or disturbances in oral pH or salivary buffering capacity. However, the included primary studies had important limitations and differences in their methodologies.

The effect of sublingual atropine sulfate on clozapine-induced hypersalivation: a multicentre, randomised placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Hypersalivation and drooling are commonly reported in clozapine-treated patients. Current management strategies have been evaluated using subjective measures. Many case reports describe the successful use of atropine in the treatment of the condition. AIMS: To measure the effect and safety of sublingual atropine on nocturnal unstimulated saliva secretion. Secondary aims were to evaluate the patient's satisfaction with the atropine effect on hypersalivation (or sialorrhea), drooling, and sleep. METHOD: Twenty-one clozapine-treated patients with hypersalivation, or drooling, were randomised to take a single 600-µg dose of sublingual atropine drops or a matching placebo. The saliva secretion was measured over 5 min at baseline and 2 h after the administration of the study medication. RESULTS: Sublingual atropine reduced the saliva secretion significantly more than the placebo (mean difference = - 57.21%, 95% CI: - 104.30, - 10.11, P = 0.02). A significant decrease in standing pulse rate was recorded in the participants in the atropine group (- 5.8 (- 9.54, - 2.15), P = 0.002). Subjectively, more patients in the atropine group found their pillow to have less saliva the following morning and found their sleep to be better. CONCLUSIONS: Sublingual atropine drops significantly reduces nocturnal unstimulated clozapine-induced saliva secretion. More research is required to compare the effect of sublingual atropine with other anticholinergic medications and different dosage forms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12618000051246.